<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Converting a Traditional IRA to a Roth a Brilliant or Stupid Idea Right Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frugaldad.com/2009/05/26/converting-traditional-ira-to-roth-ira/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frugaldad.com/2009/05/26/converting-traditional-ira-to-roth-ira/</link>
	<description>Tips for living frugal while still having a life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:28:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Simple Dollar &#187; The Simple Dollar Weekly Roundup: Bringing Back the Book Club Edition</title>
		<link>http://frugaldad.com/2009/05/26/converting-traditional-ira-to-roth-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-26468</link>
		<dc:creator>The Simple Dollar &#187; The Simple Dollar Weekly Roundup: Bringing Back the Book Club Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frugaldad.com/?p=2701#comment-26468</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Converting a Traditional IRA to a Roth a Brilliant or Stupid Idea Right Now? I actually get this question fairly often - and I agree with the conclusion. It entirely depends on the assumptions you make and your own situation - there is no blanket right answer, just like the 401(k) versus Roth IRA debate. (@ frugal dad) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Converting a Traditional IRA to a Roth a Brilliant or Stupid Idea Right Now? I actually get this question fairly often &#8211; and I agree with the conclusion. It entirely depends on the assumptions you make and your own situation &#8211; there is no blanket right answer, just like the 401(k) versus Roth IRA debate. (@ frugal dad) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://frugaldad.com/2009/05/26/converting-traditional-ira-to-roth-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-25248</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frugaldad.com/?p=2701#comment-25248</guid>
		<description>Another really important point to consider here is the upcoming Roth IRA change in 2010 that would allow you to pay the tax on conversion over two years - 2011 and 2012.  Basically deferring half the tax a full year and the other half 2 years.

 The 2010 change will also allow people with over $100k in Modified AGI to convert, something that&#039;s not available now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another really important point to consider here is the upcoming Roth IRA change in 2010 that would allow you to pay the tax on conversion over two years &#8211; 2011 and 2012.  Basically deferring half the tax a full year and the other half 2 years.</p>
<p> The 2010 change will also allow people with over $100k in Modified AGI to convert, something that&#8217;s not available now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marci</title>
		<link>http://frugaldad.com/2009/05/26/converting-traditional-ira-to-roth-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-25245</link>
		<dc:creator>marci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frugaldad.com/?p=2701#comment-25245</guid>
		<description>20 years down the road one would be 90.5 yrs old - well over the average life expectancy. So that&#039;s a consideration also.   I looked at the 10 year rates for comparison instead.    And while I am planning on 103 myself  (or at least late 90&#039;s which is what the family seems to run), not everyone is gonna live that long.

So yes - depends on whether you are just building wealth and want some to pass along to heirs, or want to spend freely in your old age.    I&#039;m just going to take from your article that there is no pat answer to this question - and remember that part. Thanks for doing the math for us :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 years down the road one would be 90.5 yrs old &#8211; well over the average life expectancy. So that&#8217;s a consideration also.   I looked at the 10 year rates for comparison instead.    And while I am planning on 103 myself  (or at least late 90&#8217;s which is what the family seems to run), not everyone is gonna live that long.</p>
<p>So yes &#8211; depends on whether you are just building wealth and want some to pass along to heirs, or want to spend freely in your old age.    I&#8217;m just going to take from your article that there is no pat answer to this question &#8211; and remember that part. Thanks for doing the math for us <img src='http://frugaldad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDFD at DivorcedDadFrugalDad</title>
		<link>http://frugaldad.com/2009/05/26/converting-traditional-ira-to-roth-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-25239</link>
		<dc:creator>DDFD at DivorcedDadFrugalDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frugaldad.com/?p=2701#comment-25239</guid>
		<description>Considering the fact that tax will have to go up in the future . . . this is a topic well worth considering . . . better to pay the piper now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the fact that tax will have to go up in the future . . . this is a topic well worth considering . . . better to pay the piper now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
